[ad_1]
For over 13 years, a former worker spent countless hours on his cell phone every day. MN has been a skilled worker for a steel mill in the Aosta Valley since 1995 and did this job until 2008. Here, due to a serious trauma, he stopped hearing completely from his right ear and for this reason, for over 13 years, he used exclusively the left ear to which he leaned a telephone with for hours and hours Etacs technology that is one of those characterized by levels of radio frequency emissions enormously higher than those of 2G GSM phones that have entered the market since 2005.
All this led the former worker to discover in 2009 a tumor, a neuroma of the acoustic nerve right on the left side of the skull and because of which he completely lost his hearing. The worker immediately blamed the prolonged use of cell phones and therefore filed a lawsuit against Inail to succeed after years in obtain disability due to occupational disease thanks to the sentence of the Turin Court of Appeal which therefore sentenced the body to pay compensation for the former worker now sixty-three.
A historic ruling for the massive use of the mobile phone
The sentence of the former worker is in some ways a historical sentence because it appears relatively different from the others. Yes, because according to the lawyers Renato Ambrosio And Stefano Bertone who assisted the former worker together with colleagues Chiara Ghibaudo and Jacopo Giunta “It is a sentence that is the fruit of a confrontation between scientists and not a sentence of jurists who take the place of science“.
In this case, in fact, the Turin Court of Appeal carried out an assessment of the documents completely different from what has happened so far with situations of this kind. Here he decided to ask an opinion from a specialist in otolaryngology, audiology and phoniatrics, the full professor of the University of Turin. Roberto Albera, author of 400 publications and 10 thousand surgeries, including nearly two hundred on neuromas. Here the professor clearly explained that “As regards the aetiology of acoustic neuroma, in its sporadic form, I recalled how to date there is still no certainty even if some favoring factors have been hypothesized for the sporadic neuroma. On the basis of experimental studies on laboratory animals it is possible to assume that the radio frequencies can be considered oncogenetic (which develop tumors, ed), but the experimental data are not necessarily applicable to humans. These data are therefore questionable about their application on humans, but certainly probative of a pathogenic effect on nervous tissue. “
What the professor explains is therefore the fact that the certainty of the use of the cell phone has caused the tumor is not there but it is equally clear that there is “ a high probability ” and this was enough for the Turin Court of Appeal to pay the former worker compensation of € 400 per month, higher than what had already been established in the first instance by the court.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
