[ad_1]
People hold white sheets of paper and flowers as police check their ID during a protest in Hong Kong, Nov. 28
Photo:
TYRONE SIU/REUTERS
The news over the weekend that
Apple
plans to move much of its iPhone supply chain out of China is the most important signal to date that Western CEOs are wising up about business risks in the People’s Republic. Any corporate board that isn’t doing the same is doing a disservice to shareholders.
Apple hasn’t announced its investment plans. But the Journal reports that the company is telling suppliers that it will move more assembly of Apple products elsewhere in Asia, especially India and Vietnam. This will no doubt be costly given that other countries lack China’s workforce of engineers and network of suppliers.
But the recent protests at an Apple supplier in Zhengzhou have highlighted the business risks of draconian Chinese Covid policies. News reports say Apple’s iPhone production could fall six million units short this year. Apple is also under growing pressure in the U.S. and elsewhere to speak up against Chinese human-rights and other abuses, though doing so would risk Communist retribution. Moving to be less dependent on China makes sense.
Western companies piled into China because of its huge market, low labor costs, and promise of market reform. But those days are over as President
Xi Jinping
has put the state back in charge of the economy and used regulation and theft to punish foreign investors. Political risks are rising fast, as the protests against zero-Covid and threats against Taiwan show. This is a shame because a China that played by global rules would be a boon to humanity, but that isn’t Mr. Xi’s Middle Kingdom.
The dilemma of zero-Covid highlights the growing business risks. There are some signs that local jurisdictions are easing lockdowns after the protests. But Mr. Xi can’t admit a mistake, and easing up risks further spread of Covid through a population that has less natural immunity and too little hospital space for severe illness.
Either way the economy will suffer. China’s growth has been sluggish this year and won’t come close to the Communist Party’s 5.5% goal. Purchasing managers’ survey data for November released last week point to contractions in manufacturing and services.
The political uncertainty is hurting more than Apple. Nikkei reported last week that Japanese auto makers are struggling to keep their Chinese factories operating. Disney’s Shanghai resort was ordered to close again on Tuesday owing to zero-Covid rules, only days after it had been allowed to reopen following a month-long shutdown. That’s only a small sample of the business disruption.
The greatest risk is Mr. Xi’s determination to swallow Taiwan on his watch—by force if necessary. In that event, the political pressure on Western companies to abandon China would be overwhelming. U.S. firms had to abandon multi-billion-dollar investments in Russia after the invasion of Ukraine, and the example should concentrate minds in corporate boards about China risks.
A buzzword in parts of Europe these days is “China for China,” meaning to locate production for the Chinese market within China but otherwise cordon China off from the rest of the global supply chain to minimize risk. This is a big change for Europe, but it still entails significant financial risk if companies are forced to divest in a hurry.
The fiasco of zero-Covid, growing Communist oppression at home and rising aggression abroad make clear that China isn’t the economic opportunity it was. This marks a significant loss for China and the world, but it’s a reality that Western companies have to confront.
Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
Source link
(This article is generated through the syndicated feeds, Financetin doesn’t own any part of this article)
