[ad_1]
The news that the EU Council’s vote to stop endothermics from 2035 has been postponed to a later date has caused much discussion. We have already seen the first reactions of the Italian government, which is in the front line in trying to review the European objectives both to lengthen the transition phase and to aim towards “technological neutrality”.
In this debate Motus-E has also entered who recalled that the automotive industry is moving towards electricity regardless of the EU goal of 2035. For the association, we need to stop arguing to be able to then take advantage of new opportunities.
With investments in the field, the road has now been traced and Italy can no longer waste time in a climate of confrontation and uncertainty. We ask Europe for a maxi common fund to transform the sector as they are doing in the USA.
According to the general secretary of Motus-E, Francis Naso“the public debate on the future of the car is focusing myopically only on 2035, but the real game for the relaunch of the Italian industry lies elsewhere“.
Francesco Naso highlights that on the date of 2035 a media and ideological clash is underway but the automotive industry is moving forward rapidly towards electric mobility, with very important investments.
Regardless of this date, now the subject of a more ideological and media clash, the sector has already begun to move in great strides towards electric for some time, with unprecedented investments that will lead many manufacturers to become fully electric well before 2035 .
After all, we are well aware that many car manufacturers have already announced a date from which they will become electric-only brands. Builders are already carrying out their electrification plans which involve particularly large investments. For the general secretary of Motus-E it is necessary to seize the industrial opportunities that are going to be created before it is too late.
The real issue on which we must focus is the reactivity of our country system in the face of an unstoppable megatrend, because every day lost in arguing about 2035 or other marginal aspects of a planned transition is a day of advantage that we give to other states, for seize the industrial opportunities that we are already mapping with the Observatory on the transformations of the automotive ecosystem.
An example, Francesco Naso points out, comes from the United States, where the much-discussed Inflation Reduction Act it is attracting tens of billions of investments, creating new businesses and jobs thanks to electric mobility.
Such a commitment from Europe would help Italy, for example, to create a solid national battery industry and to develop all the recycling opportunities, the subject of our recent study developed with Strategy& and the Milan Polytechnic.
For the association a clear vision of industrial policy is essential. With regard to Italy, Motus-E reiterates once again the need to review the incentives for the purchase of electric cars.
The resources are there, they have already been allocated, but they must be used well, and this applies to the eco-bonus but also to the PNRR funds for public use columns: there are 700 million at stake for over 21,000 charging infrastructures not to be wasted . At no cost, however, it would be a resolute political intervention to unblock the infrastructure of many motorway sections.
What can really put Italian companies and workers at risk, according to the association, it is the uncertainty that is making its way through the country, even with the more or less conscious propagation of distorted information. Therefore, for Motus-E, there are 4 priorities in this phase: overcoming the sterile ideological conflicts on the car, pressing Europe for a support plan for the conversion of the supply chain, reviewing the incentives to facilitate the transition to electric and eliminating where there are still bottlenecks for the diffusion of recharging infrastructures.
[ad_2]
Source link