[ad_1]
But not just the tours of Cameron to explore the seabed he stretched everything, the idea of shooting four films together is clearly a very strong form of saving (you produce everything once, you shoot everything together, you postproduce everything together) but also a huge effort. Produce a film (and a film of James Cameron) is not like producing a TV series, there is an unthinkable amount of work and time spent. All multiplied by four, because there are four scripts to write, rewrite and approve, there are four films with different environments, characters and situations to prepare and then there are between 8 and 10 hours of footage to post-produce. Considered that then Avatar it is practically an animated film (CGI environments, CGI characters, CGI effects…), with some human in live actionthe digital work that takes almost a year in a normal film is a rock.
To talk about the difficulties: instead of doing as you usually do for underwater scenes in performance capture (i.e. the actors pretend to be underwater and then work on computer adjustments to make the movements coherent), Cameron actually put the actors with the performance capture suits and sensors underwater, with a sub with the video camera to resume. Everyone must have already learned (and therefore trained) to hold their breath for a long time, at least to make a whole take without problems, and to make sure that it did not affect the acting, that is to have actor expressions as if they did not need to. to breathe.
The post-Avatar world
All in 3D clearly. Because Cameron he believes very much in the three-dimensional at the cinema, certainly more than the spectators who in the 13 years spent since Avatar have rewarded him less and less, also because the films released in 3D have often been disappointing, something underlined with more grace by Jon Landau himself: “After Avatar everyone hurried to make their 3D movie, not bothering to get it right. Really 3D movies, that is, shot in 3D and “dimensioned” in post production, were something else though. Hugo Cabret or Life of Pi they proved the difference and everyone noticed“. Now the Avatar sequels will bring the three-dimensional back into the room with the kind of skill, care and inventiveness of Cameron. It is unlikely that a new trail of three-dimensional films will start, we will hardly be able to be amazed again but he tries anyway.
For what it was possible to see the first of these four sequels is again technologically ambitious (even more than the original) and narratively simple, also considering its target, that is the entire planet. Avataramong other things, it was also one of the first true ones world-movie, films designed for the world and not for America, which blur national traits, incorporate values, philosophies and morals that are good for any nation. Basic values and elements appreciated everywhere, such as respect for traditions and communion with nature. Today that type of cinema is in crisis (because China has tightened the links of American films that it is willing to import and because Russia is no longer a possible market), Avatar instead promises to still be that type of film. Or rather, it still promises to be that type of film for four other films.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
