[ad_1]
To one week from electionsthe right have not yet understood which side to be on. Or rather: they have understood it very well, and they barely hold back their mouth water, but they deceive the citizens, including their constituents. They still don’t clarify whether are really on the side of democracy (authentic, liberal, built on the division of powers) or by that of cor so-called “democratures” at the Viktor Orbán. For this reason, it is not surprising that the vote against the report of the European Parliament, which renames “electoral autocracyThe Budapest regime. Perhaps to many it will seem a question far from gasoline, from bills, from shopping, from health care. We disagree.
Apart from the fact that even on those fronts the recipe of the right is all debt and endangered by the funds for the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (Pnrr) and European cohesion, when casting a vote it is necessary to take into consideration the whole package: not just what we have under our noses, but what we may soon have. The current state, of course, but also the prospects. The same multi-year progression of Orbánwhich has emptied the Hungarian system from within by marginalizing critical institutions such as NGOs and universities and opposition, tells of the importance of one long look on the risks of a vote given (or not given, in the case of the center-left malpancisti) lightly, on a whim and without a substantial evaluation.
The leader of the League says he wants to be inspired by the Hungarian family law, which focuses on the procreation of at least two children, racism towards mixed couples and the exclusion of rainbow families
It is not surprising, it was said, that the European votes of two parties like Brothers of Italy and the Leagueboth always attracted by the Hungarian model and the second also by the Putinian model, ended up in the account of the 123 against 433 in favor of a relationship that is the prelude to the belated but necessary sanctions against a Member State and the suspension of fcommunity waves destined for it. A model, the one built by Orbán in the sleepless sloth of Brussels, in which the press is only “partially free”, The TVs under government control, the National Assembly for almost fifteen years more and more devoid of powers and in any case occupied by the overwhelming majorities of Prime Minister Fidesz’s party, often gathered with elections “free but incorrect“, As decreed by the OSCE, which for years has sent hundreds of observers to the country, and with a ruthless gerrymandering, that is, political manipulation. Not to mention the civil rights, the treatment of migrants against all human standards and conventions, homophobia and transphobia or the latest abuse of women who want to have an abortion, forced to listen to the fetal heartbeat. Today’s Hungary is this stuff here, even if on long weekends with low cost flights to its majestic capital, we may not want to notice.
Is this the model to which Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Salvini aspire? According to the freshest words of the leader of the Brothers of Italy, it would seem so. “Orbán won the electionsseveral times even with a large margin, with all the rest of the constitutional arc lined up against him, is a democratic system,”Said today the leader of the Brothers of Italy a Radio Me too. Therefore Meloni considers the Hungarian democracy to all intents and purposes a functioning democracy. It must be deduced that his institutional and guarantee standards they are reduced to a minimum and, if that of Budapest is a democracy that does not deserve recalls and heavy corrections, ours could also fall into the basements of the democracies. For example by placing the judicial power under government control or by building a system of rights that become ferocious and troubled concessions, at the limits of an ethical state. On the other hand, if everything is democracy, nothing is democracy anymore, and that is the dangerous game of Meloni and Salvini. Again, if that model of the “Trump before Trump”As Steve Bannon called him – another highly regarded bad teacher in the Melonian pantheon – does not deserve a favorable vote that pushes him to improve, then he is not on the side of authentic democracy. Tertium non datur.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
