[ad_1]
In short, Italy has to say at the European tables, where however they want to lead the negotiations are France (much further back on the digital identity front) and Germany (which with its electronic card has obtained more timid results than those Italians), as well as the homelands of the largest European paper producers. The levels of assurance (levels of assurance, in technical lexicon) will, however, determine the survival of current systems. And today the line of the compromise text is to accept only the high level, which would cut off Spid. In recent weeks, the Assocertificatori trade association has written an open letter to European legislators, asking for a step back. Also because as explained Margrethe Vestager, vice president of the Commission with responsibility for digital at the presentation of the project a year ago, the goal is to achieve an adoption of digital identity “by the80% of the European population by 2040“.
De Rosa is convinced that the systems will coexist. The wallet “it will be the evolution of Spid“. The substantial-high issue, linked to the fact that smartphones today, where the identity app should be stored, are not Eidas certified, can be overcome. The Commission has taken time for now, also because the intention of France and Germany in the Council is to move in random order on the security front, thus undermining the project. Italy has also put on the plate the proposal, so far left out of the compromise text, of create a European digital home, a sort of messaging app in which the sender and recipient are recognized by high-level identity procedures and can communicate with legal validity within a system protected by end-to-end encryption. A sort of chat in which the messages are valid as registered letters and which could be used to collect a fine across the border or to conclude real estate purchases.
The barricades of the web
The latest battle against the digital identity system was waged by Mozilla, Google and Applelearns Wired. The Commission wants to link the Eidas regulation to the DMA, forcing large platforms (gatekeeper) to guarantee access to their services via community wallet. However Mozilla, as certified by a document viewed by WiredYes is first opposed to the obligation required by the regulation to accept wallet certificates for access to sites (qwacs, qualified web authentication certificates). According to the foundation behind the Firefox browser, the certificates of the European wallet, issued by states, would be less secure than those used by the platform. An accusation returned to the sender from Brussels. Google and Apple, however, they joined the Mozilla motion and in the fifth version of the agreement produced by the Council presidency, led by the Czech Republic, theobligation has been removedaccepting, at least for the moment, the appeal of the browser operators.
.
[ad_2]
Source link

