[ad_1]
But this rhetoric is also passing within circles pro-Russian, at a particularly critical moment in which Russia has every interest in destabilizing Europe. It is the case of Romanian Petkovformer Minister of the Interior of the Bulgarialeader of the pro-Russian Abv party, who described the introduction of the new foods as a “crime against Europe”it reads on Euroactiv.
Petkov then accused the European Commission of being “ready to kill our children”, because, according to his delusion, they would already be eating insects hidden in the most popular snacks and foods. Similar speech in Hungarywhose right-wing government would like to lift economic sanctions on Moscow, where Agriculture Minister Istvan Nagy said “the traditional European eating habits could be in jeopardy”.
The Union has authorized the distribution of meal made from pet crickets. From who produces it to how it will be used, from nutritional values to prices, here’s what you need to know
Collective psychosis or political strategy?
Obviously, nothing these politicians say is true. Just think of the cost of insect flours that are prowling around between 40 and 70 euros per kilowhich does not make a plan to replace these ingredients economically sustainable, in order to then resell the “counterfeit” products at the same cost as always.
Furthermore, as the European regulations specify, insect products can cause allergic reactions in people already subject to allergies to crustaceans, molluscs or mites. This means that if a person were to feel sick from ingesting insects in a product not reportedcould easily earn a lot of money by suing the manufacturing company for millionsexactly as it would for peanuts.
Cricket snacks and burgers, seaweed pasta, cheeses made from vegetable proteins: a journey into a new generation of sustainable ingredients
The rhetoric of the siege
However, this new campaign that has once again unified the European right it is not a random choice, but it is based on a strategy of victimhood that is now typical of the sovereign movements of the new millennium. It is a precise strategy, which aims at create imaginary enemies against whom to unleash culture warsso as to be able to hide real problems and issues.
These enemies are and have been migrants, feminists, environmentalists, the lgbtq+ community or the politically correct. On them right-wing politicians build what is called siege rhetoricin which they represent themselves as an oppressed minority in dangercrushed by everything that is not like them: that is, white, Christian and Western.
The siege rhetoric also works with insects. In fact, the statements used speak of dangers to the traditional eating habits, attacks on national cuisinesputting on the other side of the fence the imaginary enemy materialized in the clandestine plan to impose insects on the table of all people. As usual, this sterile controversy will lead nowhere, but it will have wasted us a lot of time.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
