[ad_1]
OPINION:
I was interested to read “The future of Clean Energy: Policies, production & potential in 2022,” the special section that accompanied The Washington Times on Sept. 29, but disappointed in the content. With the exception of two pieces, the rest were authored by politicians, and none by scientists or technologists who could have provided authoritative information on the likely effectiveness, cost and time scale of future alternative energy capabilities.
The opening op-ed by South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem provided an excellent summary of the situation by noting that we need a broad approach using all available sources, and it is the free market that will lead us to success. The idea of government agencies picking winners is a hopeless approach that has proved ineffective several times.
As a nation, we are woefully ignorant of the possibilities of maintaining our lifestyle as governments attempt to cut back on traditional sources of energy production, particularly the burning of fossil fuels. So the idea of a special supplement to review the future of clean energy is commendable. But next time, please include some hard facts regarding the route to fruition.
STANLEY ORMAN
Rockville, Maryland
[ad_2]
Source link
(This article is generated through the syndicated feeds, Financetin doesn’t own any part of this article)
