[ad_1]
The government of United Kingdom presented a bill that punishes asylum seekers arriving in the country illegally through the English Channel. While in Italy the question of the shipwreck of Cutro and we try to understand the political responsibilities behind the 70 dead migrantsfrom London have announced a new tough fight against immigrationa topic that has long been at the center of public debate.
If the bill were to become operational, anyone arriving in the country by sea would be subjected to detention and sent back to its home state, whatever the situation therein. A plan that has been criticized almost everywhere and which was also opposed by theUnited Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).
The fight over immigration in the UK
In 2022 they were 45,755 people who have gone through the English Channel with more or less makeshift boats to reach the United Kingdom. The numbers are growing compared to past years: in 2021 they did not reach 30,000 admissions, while in 2020 they remained below 10,000, also thanks to the limitations given by the COVID-19.
Second an analysis published by the organization Refugee Council in recent weeks, the 60 percent of asylum applications made by people who arrived in the UK via the Channel in 2022 will be accepted. And the same analysis underlines that most of the arrivals concern people fleeing wars and whose day-to-day safety is not guaranteed in the country of origin. The five most frequent states of origin of those arriving by sea in 2022 are in fact Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Eritrea and Sudan.
Faced with this situation, a political clash over immigration has recently flared up in London and the Conservative governments led first by Boris Johnsonthen from Liz Trussfinally from Rishi Sunakhave taken or tried to take radical measures to counter the arrival of migrants and their reception.
The most striking case is that relating to the Rwanda. In April 2022 UK Home Secretary Priti Patel and Rwandan Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta they signed an agreement that provides for the deportation in the African country of quotas of migrants who entered the United Kingdom illegally, waiting to understand the outcome of their asylum application. A kind of intercontinental “parking”., in exchange for paying Rwanda large sums of money. However, a measure blocked a few hours after the departure of the first flight by a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights, which declared it illegitimate. In December, the High Court in London instead defined the plan as legitimate, which is still the focus of a judicial battle.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
