[ad_1]
This rhetoric was amplified by Russian state TV. An MP, Andrei Kartapolov, publicly stated that the invasion was necessary for Russian forces to seize Ukrainian nuclear facilities and prevent Zelensky. “di build a dirty bomb“.
When Putin’s war began, the nuclear spectrum continued to be a useful topic to be served to the Russian public. In early March, Ria Novosti, a state-run news agency, quoted an unnamed government official who claimed Ukraine was using “the area of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant as a site for the development of nuclear weapons”.
New “narrative” peaks
Over time, the accusations became elaborate: the pro-government channels began to insinuate that Kyiv would not only detonate a dirty bomb, but that it had missile systems capable of reaching Russian territory. This invented bogey quickly became a pretext for invoking the threat of nuclear war.
On the state channel Channel Onea conductor, in front of the graphics of the Russian submarine nuclear drone, promised that Europe would be transformed into a “radioactive desert“ if Moscow had decided to strike, a decision that could have been made, he added days later, if the country had heard overly threatened. This rhetoric became ubiquitous as the war progressed.
The intense fighting around the nuclear power plant of Zaporizhzhia, the largest in Europe, raised fears that a stray artillery shell could lead to the spread of radiation in the surrounding area. After Russian forces took over the plant, Moscow accused Ukraine of risking a nuclear meltdown by continuing to fight.
Russian TV, meanwhile, has turned Zaporizhzhia into a red line, threatening that if the central “is damaged and disaster occurs, two missiles will instantly land in your decision centers – has said commentator Yuri Kot -. One in Washington and the other in London“. Throughout the summer and fall, some Russian state TV commentators spoke of nuclear war as an eventuality, arguing in one case that were missing “days or a week“ to nuclear war.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
