[ad_1]
Get a fine it is certainly not a pleasant thing. Now, news is coming for whom commits the same infringement several times at the wheel of his car. Thanks to a series of amendments approved by the Senate to the decree law on the safety of infrastructures and transport, all those who commit the same infringement several times while driving their car, without immediate objection, they will pay only one infraction.
The violation, even at different times, of the same rule relating to the circulation of a vehicle that does not have the technical or administrative requisites required by law is considered, where the conditions referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 are met and for the purposes of applying the sanction envisaged from paragraph 4, as a single infringement. It is understood that the conduct committed after the first notification or immediate notification constitute new violations.
Therefore, this novelty should set the an end to the phenomenon of serial fines. So, no multiple fines if, for example, a motorist passes through a ZTL several times in a row. Attention, however, the first dispute will “absorb” the offenses ascertained in the previous 90 days and not yet notified.
In the case of ascertainment of several violations without immediate contestation pursuant to article 201, the administrative offense subject to the first notification absorbs those ascertained in the ninety days prior to the same notification and not yet notified.
The payment of the fine will constitute the prerequisite for the filing of the absorbed violations.
The payment of the sum provided for in paragraph 4, made to the traffic police body that handled the first notification or immediate dispute, with simultaneous payment of the costs of assessment and notification for the violation it ascertained, constitutes the prerequisite for the request. archiving, as per paragraph 7, of the violations absorbed pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3.
The application for archiving must be submitted by the interested party to the office or command which depends on the person who ascertained each violation absorbed pursuant to paragraph 6, under penalty of forfeiture, within one hundred and twenty days from the date of the first notification or immediate complaint. The application is accompanied by a copy of the proof of payment referred to in paragraph 6 and the proof of payment of the costs of assessment and notification relating to the violation or violations ascertained by the office or to the command to which the same is presented. The filing is arranged by the head of the office or command on which the person who ascertained the violation depends.
But that’s not all, as the amendments introduced some further changes to the Highway Code. The further novelty concerns the violations committed by vehicles registered abroad when it is not possible, due to objective difficulties, to register for the role or initiate other compulsory collection procedures against the driver or the owner of the vehicle. In these cases, the compulsory collection can be activated in the following five years against those who were found driving the vehicle.
When the vehicle with which the violation was committed is registered abroad and it is not possible, due to objective difficulties, to register for the role or to initiate other compulsory collection procedures against the driver or the owner or other obliged person in solid, the compulsory collection can be activated, in the following five years, against those found driving the vehicle itself. In such cases, the provisions of article 207 apply. With a provision of the Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructure and Mobility, in agreement with the Ministry of the Interior, the procedures for collecting and attributing the sums collected to the subjects to whom according to article 208, the proceeds of the sanctions are due.
[ad_2]
Source link
