We provide experimental evidence that core intertemporal choice anomalies — including extreme short-run impatience, structural estimates of present bias, hyperbolicity and transitivity violations — are driven by complexity rather than time or risk preferences. First, all anomalies also arise in structurally similar atemporal decision problems involving valuation of iteratively discounted (but immediately paid) rewards. These computational errors are strongly predictive of intertemporal decisions. Second, intertemporal choice anomalies are highly correlated with indices of complexity responses including cognitive uncertainty and choice inconsistency. We show that model misspecification resulting from ignoring behavioral responses to complexity severely inflates structural estimates of present bias.

That is from a new NBER working paper by Benjamin Enke, Thomas Graeber, and Ryan Oprea.

The post Complexity and time appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.


Source link

(This article is generated through the syndicated feed sources, Financetin doesn’t own any part of this article)

See also  Catholic Bishop David O’Connell Shot Dead in His Home in Los Angeles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *