The bill, strongly supported by the Northern League president of Veneto Luca Zaia, was also defined by the Everyday occurrence how the secession of the richbecause it could insure many more funding to the northern regionswhich already have more resources than those in the South.

A woman holding a blister pack of contraceptive pills
Lazio and the other regions where the contraceptive pill is free

From February, the hormonal contraceptive will be available free of charge in Lazio consultants. However, the region is not the only one – nor the first – to have introduced this rule

The essential levels of performance

One of the most disputed points of the proposal, in fact, is that relating to the financing of essential levels of performance which must be guaranteed throughout the national territory, known as Lep, which according to the Constitution they protect i “civil and social rights” of citizens and citizens. The extent of this funding should be established first of requests for autonomy, so as to be clear on how many resources each requesting region needs.

But according to the bill, which gives the government one year to decide the Lep, the regions will also be able to formulate an agreement without the decree of the Prime Minister which should establish the entity of the Lepthus distributing the funding based on historical spending of the region in the specific area in which it seeks autonomy.

And this is the point at the heart of the disputes, and which justifies the term of “Secession of the Rich”because it would ensure more funding to the northern regionsas they have more resources and a higher historical expenditure, and less to those of the South, where there are fewer resources and therefore a lower historical expenditure. In this way, the inequalities between the two poles of the country would be accentuated even more.

See also  We’ll find a way to save the car engine – POLITICO

The school

On Republic, Luca Bianchithe director of the Svimez research center on the regional divide, criticized Calderoli’s bill by arguing precisely how the definition of Lep expects from “over twenty years” and to this day they have “the service gaps in our country have crystallized”. Furthermore, again according to Bianchi, autonomy would seriously affect the school system with “a true separatist process in which they would have “different programs at the regional level, territorial recruitment systems and differentiated operations”.

Criticism also supported by the sociologist Chiara Saraceno on the Pressaccording to which “in the decades since the constitutional reform that introduced regional autonomy, it has not yet been possible to define the Lep”. While in the school environment it would not be “it is possible to leave the implementation of the constitutional task of the school to the different local availability and choices”because already now “there is an unjust differentiation of the public educational resources offered in the area national, not only between regions, but also within the same regions and cities”. Differences that “they overlap with social and contextual inequalities, instead of compensating for them”.

The requirements

Another point at the center of the disputes, explained by the professor of economics Paolo Balduzzi on Lavoce.infois that in the bill regions are not required to have “accounts in order” or not to have been police station previously for the management of the matters for which he requests”. And among these are education, health care, energy production and environmental protection, all particularly sensitive and risky areas.

The approval

Finally, the bill it doesn’t even specify how to trigger requests of autonomy, leaving the task of drawing up the agreement between the state and the region to the government, and then sending it to the region in question for approval. After that, again on the basis of Calderoli’s proposal, Parliament would have no say in the matterbecause the Council of Ministers would only have to present a bill to the chambers to approve the agreement, on which deputies and senators would not have the possibility to propose changes, in fact by disempowering the legislative body.

.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *