From the comments, on AI safety

This is from Richard Ngo, who works on the governance team at OpenAI:

A few points:
1. I agree that the alignment community has generally been remiss in not trying hard enough to clarify the arguments in more formal papers.
2. The only peer-reviewed paper making the case for AI risk that I know of is: Though note that my paper (the second you linked) is currently under review at a top ML conference.
3. I don’t think that a formal model would shed much light here. My goal in writing my paper was to establish misaligned power-seeking AGI as a credible scientific hypothesis; I think that most who think it’s credible would then agree that investigating it further should be a key priority, whether or not their credences are more like 10% or more like 90%.

From this batch of comments.  Here is Richard on Twitter.

The post From the comments, on AI safety appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

Source link

(This article is generated through the syndicated feed sources, Financetin doesn’t own any part of this article)

See also  Chris Evans Supports Jeremy Renner After Snow Plow Accident – Hollywood Life

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

%d bloggers like this: