[ad_1]
The latest advances in mirrorless cameras have brought new technologies to make life easier for photographers. One of the most talked about is certainly focusing with subject recognition and tracking. Cars, motorcycles, trains are added to the subjects who, thanks to algorithms created using artificial intelligence, can be recognized by cameras: people, faces, eyes and animalswith particular attention in the latter case also to birds.
APS-C vs. Full Frame: by nature and sport the results are not taken for granted
We have seen the new technologies of AF Tracking on Canon EOS R3, but to follow also Nikon Z 9 immediately presented itself in the wake and recently Fujifilm X-H2S has also made the technology land on APS-C mirrorless.
In particular, we recently previewed the new born Fujifilm, having immediately the feeling that the Japanese technicians had finally filled the gap with the Canon and Nikon competition in terms of speed and reliability of autofocus.
As you well know, however, the sensations are not enough for us and we wanted to organize a direct confrontation. In particular, we tested the current queen of sports cameras, Nikon Z 9, and the newborn Fujifilm X-H2S, which aims to take the scepter of queen among the APS-Cs, but also to challenge full framecounting on some advantages of the small formatincluding limited weights and dimensions and the multiplication of the focal length, which allows you to build telephoto lenses with a very low angle of view in portable form factors.
To do this I also relied on the experience of a professional, Fabio Grandi, and with him I participated in one of the events of which the official photographer, the NASCAR Whelen Euro Series. The races take place over two days, including warm-up, qualifying and two races each for professional drivers and amateurs (who share the same car).
Fabio Grandi struggling with the two ‘cannons’
Basically, one day I shot with Fujifilm and Fabio with Nikon, while the next day we swapped roles. Fabio currently shoots with a Nikon reflex kit and it was interesting to add theFTZ II adapter, to take advantage of Nikon F-Mount lenses born for reflex cameras on mirrorless cameras, with total compatibility. Much of the comparison, however, was carried out using the Fujinon XF150-600mmF5.6-8 R LM OIS WR telezoom on the one hand and the Nikkor Z 800 S VR f / 6.3 on the other.
Recognize which Z 9 and which X-H2S?
Here is a summary of the main technical characteristics of the two cameras:
| Nikon Z 9 | Fujifilm X-H2S |
|---|---|
| Stabilized 35mm Stacked Full Frame Sensor | Stabilized Stacked APS-C sensor |
| 45.7 megapixels | 26.2 megapixels |
| 20 fps RAW ES only 120 fps at 11 megapixels |
15 fps RAW MS + 40 fps RAW ES |
| 8.3K 60p and 4K 120p N-RAW – 4K 60p ProRes RAW HQ – 8K 30p and 4K 120p | 6.2K 30p – 4K 60p – 4K 120p ProRes 422HQ |
| CFexpress and XQD cards | CFexpress and SDXC cards |
| 3.69 million dot OLED viewfinder | 5.76 million dot OLED viewfinder |
| Integrated handle with LAN | Optional vertical handle with LAN-type expansion ports |
| 1340 grams with batteries | 660 grams with battery (battery grip to be added) |
| 6,099 | € 2,799.99 |
| Nikkor Z 800 S VR f / 6.3 (2.385 kg – 7.490 ) | Fujinon XF150-600mmF5.6-8 R LM OIS WR (1.6 kg – 2249.99 ) |
How did it go? I’ll tell you in a video and I anticipate that the results of the head-to-head comparison are not taken for granted:
[HWUVIDEO=”3272″]Nikon Z 9 vs. Fujifilm X-H2S: to the trackside test with NASCAR[/HWUVIDEO]
For those curious to analyze the results, here are two photo galleries of the images taken by Fabio with the two sports mirrorless:
.
[ad_2]
Source link
