[ad_1]
For every trouble of the boy, for every discovery of his misdeeds, this film is always and only interested in the effect on Hugh Jackman, that is, how the father reacts, what you trigger in him and where you take him. This troubled boy is nothing more than a concentrate of adolescent problems. He is not a character, it’s a device narrativeit’s not there because we can understand it and empathize with it, it’s there to move the story forward and make the real protagonist react emotionally. So instead of pitying him we can only find him repulsive, unpleasant, annoying and unbearable, because he is only a concentrate of problems and not a human being.
In this torture film during which we are placed in the most uncomfortable of positions to suffer together with a hero who seems helpless, because all his efforts are in vain, because he doesn’t always know what to do and because he in turn comes from a difficult past, the only option for the public is to feel bad for them. Which isn’t really that great. Also the exhibition of a rifle at some point it will only create anxiety about its use. After seeing it it is difficult not to spend all the time wondering whether or not that weapon will fulfill its destiny, what it was created for in the first instance. The Father, although it was not really a comedy, he managed to create a strange suspended atmosphere in which to feel at the same time son and father, a powerless person in front of a father oppressed by senile dementia and at the same time a lost person in his fast moving between memory and I remember. Here instead we are stuck in a chair watching other people go downhill.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
